Good one! LOLOLOL!
> From: rvu...@comcast.net > To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:58:29 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] WD 40 > > Interesting that you read this in his obituary. Maybe that should tell you > something. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Maeder" <appywan...@hotmail.com> > To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l@oldcrank.org> > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 3:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] WD 40 > > > > They must have changed formulation. Just a few years ago, I recall reading > > the obituary of one of the founders and he boasted that he could drink the > > main active ingredient with no I'll effects. It must actually be WD-41 > > now! > > > >> From: steve_nor...@msn.com > >> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > >> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:38:10 -0500 > >> Subject: [Phono-L] WD 40 > >> > >> > >> Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) It is not fish oil, I got that e-mail > >> and believed it for a while. Below is the list from their MSDS sheet. > >> > >> http://www.wd40.com/files/pdf/msds-wd494716385.pdf > >> > >> > >> Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 45 to 50% > >> > >> Petroleum Base Oil less than 25% > >> > >> LVP Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 12 to 18% > >> > >> Carbon Dioxide 2 to 3% > >> > >> Surfactant less than 2% > >> > >> Non-Hazardous Ingredients less than 10% > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Phono-L mailing list > >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Phono-L mailing list > > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
