Hi Harvey,

George must have read the The Edison "Home" Phonograph, 1896 - 1901 in the Sept 
2006 CAPS The Sound Box.  This was a wonderful article well worth the price of 
the annual subscription.  I still refer to this article for the most valuable 
information it provides.

I cannot say enough about how enjoyable The Sound Box is to read.

Steve

> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 16:01:02 -0700
> From: harveykrav...@yahoo.com
> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Edison Brass Mandrels...  some idle thoughts...
> 
> Hi George,
> Thanks for the help. I really appreciate it. 
> All the best.
> Harvey
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: "gpaul2...@aol.com" <gpaul2...@aol.com>
> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
> Sent: Mon, May 17, 2010 2:00:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Edison Brass Mandrels...  some idle thoughts...
> 
> 
> Harvey,
> 
> An Edison "Home" numbered in the 3400 range would date from February 1898.  
> As I noted yesterday on the ATM board, "Homes" began appearing with 
> nickel-plated mandrels in October/November 1898.  Hope this helps - - 
> 
> George P.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: harvey kravitz <harveykrav...@yahoo.com>
> To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l@oldcrank.org>
> Sent: Mon, May 17, 2010 3:09 pm
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Edison Brass Mandrels...  some idle thoughts...
> 
> 
> Hi Al,
> Thank you for all your help.I really learned a lot from you. I have an Edison 
> suit case Home with a 3400's serial number. Do you know if it had a brass 
> mandrel? It was converted into a 2/4 min. machine either by the original 
> owner 
> or a collector. If this indeed had a brass mandrel, I'd love to get it back 
> to 
> original.
> Thanks,
> Harvey Kravitz
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: "clockworkh...@aol.com" <clockworkh...@aol.com>
> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
> Sent: Sun, May 16, 2010 4:04:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Edison Brass Mandrels...  some idle thoughts...
> 
> 
> Greetings Harvey:
> 
> The solid brass mandrels were on the early M and E electric machines. They 
> were press fit onto the steel mandrel shaft.  Even in those days solid brass 
> of that diameter was expensive so few are found to be solid after 1896.  As 
> the M topworks was adapted for the Springmotor machines the brass mandrel 
> became a hollow cylinder with brass ends pressed in.  It was a thick wall 
> brass which still carried some weight.  The smaller diameter end was indented 
> to allow for the needle bearing guard on the endgate.  In 1901 the nickel 
> plated thin walled drawn brass mandrel allowed for a drastic reduction in 
> brass 
> costs and reduced the number of machining operations.  The indented end 
> continued for the M and E but the new Triumph line did not require it.  For 
> the 
> rest of the Triumph production the drawn brass mandrel continued to serve 
> well.
> 
> The Home phonograph had the thick walled hollow brass mandrel with end 
> pieces almost from the earliest machines.  Only the very lowest serial 
> numbers 
> are occasionally found with a solid mandrel and the indented end.  The Home 
> had that thick walled brass mandrel for a long time but wall thickness was 
> reduced as nickel plating was added.  The drawn thin brass mandrel was 
> introduced before the 1901 new style cabinet change. The length of the 
> mandrel 
> shaft remained the same until the Model B was introduced.
> 
> SADLY, there are sellers who swap out the brass mandrel for a later thin 
> walled nickeled mandrel.  They then charge more for the brass mandrel than 
> they paid for the whole phonograph.  So, you can find a Home with a serial 
> number below 9000 with a shiny nickeled mandrel that should not be there.   
> And 
> further along there will be an eBay listing for the original brass mandrel 
> for a higher price than the mutt machine.  Grrrrr ! ! !
> 
> I hope that helps.  I am away from my research materials so I only 
> guarantee the above to be 50% correct...
> 
> Al
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to