enabling it. And none really objected.
Initiated the request: Yasuo
No objection: Stig, Derick
Liked the idea: Wez, Rui
Hatmud and Dan mentioned some comparison to other comparable changes.
Which had negative side effects and generally Dan is known to be against
enabling any module by default.
For me the concern was that it may be enabled by default if it is stable.
As Derick wrote this seems the same as the result we now have.
The only difference is that for some reason some people now think mbstring
isn't stable. I guess that came from the start of the discussion where some
talk of the conference was reported, something like "function overloading could
harm php". But function overloading was disabled by default i thought.
marcus
At 12:06 13.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> > Then can you please also count the votes for enabling it in the first
> > place when it was enabled by default in this[1] patch? I couldn't find
> > any discussion on this.
> >
> > [1] http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/ext/mbstring/config.m4?login=2&r1=1.5&r2=1.6&ty=h
>
> Actually he did.
> Please see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=101805486809856&w=2
But I don't see any voting there, and I see the same concerns that are
raised now.
Derick
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
JDI Media Solutions
--------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
