On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> It is not huge amount of work but we should agree on php-dev first about
> what the version number will look like both number wise and format wise,
> i.e. string vs. integer, 1.0.3 vs. 2001008. Probably the latter date is
> more useful in this context.
stig posted a set of really useful ones here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=98918784106598&w=2
personally, i would like to see something like:
$return = get_ext_version("xml");
where return contains:
$return["number"]["major"] = 4;
$return["number"]["minor"] = 0;
$return["number"]["patch"] = 6;
and
$return["date"]["YYYY"] = 2001;
$return["date"]["MM"] = 06;
$return["date"]["DD"] = 23;
or similar. what do you think?
dates are ok, but sometimes you have to rush a version out the door twice
on the same day. therefore, i think its probably a good idea to have a MMP
number as well as the date.
- avi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
