Hey Yasuo, 

Could you give a complete url to the DSO recommendation? Most
instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend
static compiles. 

Thanks...

- AZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
August wrote:
> Sebastian wrote:
>>if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO 
>>anyhow? It's the preferred method.
>>
> 
> Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented
> somewhere?

In apache document.

> 
> I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it
> makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile 
> is negligible when looking at something that will be installed for 
> timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms.

The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache.

For instance, I would like to use info or status module when
I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all
the time.

-- 
Yasuo Ohgaki


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to