fair enough. :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:45 PM > To: James Cox > Cc: Jedi/Sector One; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP audit > > > We decided not to use branches for development at all, only for > releases... I think we should stick to it. > > Zeev > > At 15:41 14/03/2002, James Cox wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:34:06PM -0000, James Cox wrote: > > > > What's stopping you committing it to cvs.php.net ? > > > > > > It might be better to work on a separate tree, and later let > > > PHP developpers > > > merge what parts they want to. > > > > > > Or maybe we can work on cvs.php.net on a separate branch. > > > > >Personally, i think it might be a good idea to cut a branch for it -- and > >merge to head bit by bit.. but looking at the patch i think it > looks pretty > >good -- and is needed (imo). > > > >apply (if you haven't already) at http://www.php.net/cvs-php.php > > > >Thanks, > > > >James > > > > > >-- > >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
