Maybe we should move it into PECL then? Andi
At 17:31 14/03/2002 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 05:07:34PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Is there any reason why this extension is calling TlsAlloc()? > > Why isn't it using the regular TSRM interface like all other extensions? > > > > Andi > > >The problem with the filepro extension is: its not really maintained >i fixed the most obvious bugs within but it is questionable if this >extension is of any use. I doubt that it is used at all. I know that >SuSE Linux has it compiled in, thats why i fixed the bugs because one >could bypass safe_mode restrictions by exploiting the bufferoverflows. >Anyway the whole design of filepro is bad imho. Its only possible to >work on one database at the same time and there is no cleanup function >that means after the script is terminated there is still memory >allocated until the next filepro access. > >Stefan -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
