Mybe it would make sence to have MI for compile time and aggregation for run time. So we can have good design with MI and prototyping and testing and quick hacks with aggregeation. But doing compile times work with run time methods?
marcus At 23:58 08.04.2002, you wrote: >If MI can be emulated using aggregation, how hard would it be to add the >syntax for MI to the language, but have it implement it using aggregation? > >Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > At 00:44 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote: > >>If aggregation is included then i see it is absoulty necessary to include > >>MI too. > > > > In my opinion, only one of them (at most) has room in PHP. Having both is > > messy. My personal preference is MI, which is why I prefer tagging > > aggregation as experimental. > > > > Zeev > > > >-- >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
