I wasn't proposing putting it in HEAD, just that the work was done 
against HEAD not against your apache_hooks.  Lukas redid all the 
php<->apache request object work fresh off of head, and I made changes 
off of that, so it contains nothing from your apache_hooks branch.

Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

>I think if we put this in 4.3 we are going to delay 4.3 even further.
>Although, I suppose if we are careful and make sure we #ifdef it nicely
>and only turn it on with a configure option, we can put it in HEAD.
>
>So, is your patch my apache_hooks stuff + Lukas's work and then your stuff
>on top?
>
>On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
>
>>All of this work was off HEAD.  Should a  new_apache_hooks branch be tagged?
>>
>>Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>>>I say commit it.  This stuff is very experimental as it is and lives in
>>>its own branch.  You are not going to destabilize anything.
>>>
>>>(I just made sure you had enough karma for the commit)
>>>
>>>-Rasmus
>>>
>>
>
>




-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to