At 22:27 28.08.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote: > > > I hope we could reach a consensus to leave the following modules in the > > normal php distribution: old extensions, those maintaind by those > developing > > php's core and the extensions heavily integrated into ph (like > mbstring) and at > > least those extensions important extensions like gd and xml stuff. > >I don't agree on the "old extensions" part, for example "yaz", "dotnet" >or "notes".
I guess those were bad examples. But i meant maintained and working modules. I think you're right to move such extensions to PECL after that is working. > > > > Moving less maintained and less important modules to PECL might be a good > > idea as soon as PECL is ready to be THE distribution on any platform. Until > > that is reached PECL development or planning shouldn't harm php > development. > >Having exif not enabled by default doesn't harm development at all. If >people want exif, they can enable it just fine. Adding more 'bloat' >(this has nothing to do with the usefulness) to the default compilation >is not a good thing, for example we could have enabled sockets, sysvshm, >sysvsem... too by default. > >Derick Of cause exif doesn't affect php development in any way! I meant here that PECL development must not hurt php development. marcus -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
