> The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g. > they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not > succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works > only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1 > or php4.2.y2? It should be clearly mentioned, that the support for > apache2 isn't production stable ;-)
I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the documentation about Apache 2 support. 1. It's not production ready 2. If someone want to set it up, how to do it (Linux, Windows) 3. What PHP versions work with what Apache 2 versions 4. It should be noted, that Apache 1 support is continued ;) > Also a point to consider is the name of the correct cgi executable > for win: in 4.2.3 it's php.exe the cli-build names php-cli.exe. > In the 4.3.0-dev the cli names php.exe and the cgi-version > php-cgi.exe. I don't know why the names changed, maybe to confuse the > people once more and to give some work for the doc-folks ;-) Doh, it would be nice to stick to some final names ;) NOTE: cca. 80% of the user notes on the Apache setup page deals with Apache 2 installation. We should add verified info to the docs, and delete those notes. There are many sites offering a php4apache2.dll to download. These can harm our users, as they can contain any vulnerable code, which our users download, just because there is no official support/documentation for Apache... http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.apache.php Please keep this in mind, Goba -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
