# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-12 13:08:33 +0100: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 07:54, Derick Rethans wrote: > > And that's why I would be -1 on the first one. However, the whole > > error reporting is a pretty mess, with some extensions implementing > > other 'philosiphies' then others. Getting this all nice and clean is > > another point we should address in PHP 5 (just like Stig mentioned). > > I did not mention that here, but I would like to go through the PHP > source and introduce Unix-style (EPERM etc.) error codes in all calls > to php_error(). But that's not a topic for this mailing list.
"Call to nonexistent function" -> ENOTIMPL? :) -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php