# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-12 13:08:33 +0100:
> On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 07:54, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > And that's why I would be -1 on the first one. However, the whole
> > error reporting is a pretty mess, with some extensions implementing
> > other 'philosiphies' then others. Getting this all nice and clean is
> > another point we should address in PHP 5 (just like Stig mentioned).
> 
> I did not mention that here, but I would like to go through the PHP
> source and introduce Unix-style (EPERM etc.) error codes in all calls
> to php_error().  But that's not a topic for this mailing list.

    "Call to nonexistent function" -> ENOTIMPL? :)

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to