On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-12 13:08:33 +0100:
> > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 07:54, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > > And that's why I would be -1 on the first one. However, the whole
> > > error reporting is a pretty mess, with some extensions implementing
> > > other 'philosiphies' then others. Getting this all nice and clean is
> > > another point we should address in PHP 5 (just like Stig mentioned).
> >
> > I did not mention that here, but I would like to go through the PHP
> > source and introduce Unix-style (EPERM etc.) error codes in all calls
> > to php_error(). But that's not a topic for this mailing list.
>
> "Call to nonexistent function" -> ENOTIMPL? :)
Nope, ENOSYS would be appropiate for that.
#define ENOSYS 38 /* Function not implemented */
- Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
