I would add to this that given the goal to provide a standard pattern, in the absence of legitimate issues with pre-existing standards, the status quo should prevail. The consistency and rigidity of the standard is a lot more important than what the standard actually prescribes.
On Thursday, 18 August 2016 12:08:12 UTC+12, Woody Gilk wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Roman Tsjupa <draco...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> It is not about being right or wrong really. Its more about being strict >> for no good reason. Its a backwards compatible change, so if you like you >> can still suffix your interfaces. >> >> > Roman, the reason FIG exists is that it takes personal choice out of the > matter and thereby provides consistency. This proposal does neither. > > -- > Woody Gilk > http://about.me/shadowhand > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/21b8c0bb-40d7-40d4-bcb0-2764d951c47a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
