I've now created an issue, hoping to restart work <https://github.com/container-interop/service-provider/issues/51> on this. Although I haven't been contributing to the PSR per se, I have been working quite a lot with SP. But please, can we not use Google Groups? It's atrocious! Is there a FIG Slack, or something like that?
On Wednesday, January 8, 2020 at 8:37:34 PM UTC+1, Benjamin Mack wrote: > > Hi list, > > since we (TYPO3 CMS) are continuing our path in modernizing our PHP stack, > we've been looking for ways to standardize our container implementation. > While it's good to have PSR-11 for Service Containers - and we utilize this > with our latest version - we had some discussions around the actual service > providers (factories, extensions), and my _guess_ is that it was a too much > to put into PSR-11 and to tackle container PSR first, and then "at some > point" see if service provider PSR would be feasible. > > We found the service-provider package (air quotes EXPERIMENTAL, > https://github.com/container-interop/service-provider/) to be extremely > cool, but were reluctant to depend on the package, but would really love to > see such a (IMHO common) need to be provided as a PHP Standards > Recommendation. > > So, my question is: Is there an interest (either by the original PSR-11 > gang, CC or by somebody else in this list) to invest this topic further? Or > did I just miss some communication that this isn't something that is > feasible in moving forward? > > Thanks in advance for any hints and clarification! > > Benni Mack, > TYPO3 Project Lead > https://typo3.org - inspire people to share. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/b1d30dc6-7afa-4110-9501-9e9748043715%40googlegroups.com.
