Just to add an authoritative answer here. Mucking up the reply-to header is simply wrong. I don't really care what arguments you come up with, it makes no technical sense. The list has been configured this way for years and years and believe me, it is the safest and most flexible configuration. If you guys can't figure out how to use reply-all and procmail to filter out duplicates if you don't want to see those, well, then tough. This is a technical mailing list. I refuse to let a small group of folks without the technical know-how make a mess of the list for all of us who know how to deal with mailing lists correctly.
-Rasmus On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nigel Jones wrote: > Ok lets put it this way... > > There is LESS chance that a reply should be directed to X user than to the > whole list > > If I want to CC something to the writer then let me but 99%(all together) of > Mailing List Posts are directed to the actual List. > > Also why do we have to change clients? We have a FREEDOM of CHOICE > > If messing with the Reply-To headers then why does the NZPHPUG do it? > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Maybe we should consider a change or have a list like Digest(or whatever it > is) where the Reply-To header is 'mugged' > > My 2 cents > > > > _________________ > Nigel Jones > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
