Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 13:36, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 11:32, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
The above notation is unnecessary when developing in PHP5, as objects in
PHP5 are passed by reference by default. However, in PHP4, this was
Not entirely, there's still a subtle difference in PHP5 between
assigning an object with = versus assigning with = &.
Would you mind explaining the difference? I've seen nothing in the docs,
to indicate that assigning objects with =& in PHP5 is necessary, or even
desired. My experience with PHP5 hasn't shown this either. I'd be
interested to know to what you refer.
See for yourself when running the following script:
Cheers,
Rob.
I am stunned! Since I try to make my code working for both PHP4 and PHP5
I try to never rely on PHP4's standard cloning behaviour, and use &
where I can, so I have never really encountered this, but this will
propably save my a lot of frustration when the rest of the world says
goodbye to PHP4. (I remember when I first encountered the 'references in
constructor'-issue)
excellent stuff!
grt,
Evert
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
