On 4/26/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 5:26 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote:
>On 4/26/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>At 5:06 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote:
>>>It's not XHTML 1.0 Strict valid .. :P
>>>You're page is HTML 4.01 valid, i think you should make it XHTML 1.0 Strict.
>>
>>Argggg. Then I would have to add all those "/" to my ">" in all my
>>code in all my sites. Literally millions of new "/" would have to be
>>added. That act could possibly crash the net.
>>
>>So, until someone points out a good reason for me to change (I'm open
>>for redirection), I'll continue to use what works for me. Besides,
>>it's still compliant, isn't it?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>tedd
>
>HTML 4.01 will become deprecated earlier then XHTML 1.0 :)
>
>That's all i know :P
>
>Tijnema
And tedd will become deprecated earlier than teddd -- I can wait.
Besides, when HTML 4.01 finally does, someone will make a parser that
will fix everything.
Cheers,
tedd
Hmm, if that is gonna work completly, i want to see :P
Look how many things are deprecated/removed in XHTML 1.0 Strict v HTML 4.01
A lot things have been replaced with styles in XHTML 1.0 Strict.
I see microsoft as the first one that will ignore HTML 4.01, in IE8 maybe?
Tijnema
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
