On 4/26/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 19:17 +0200, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 4/26/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 5:26 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote:
> > >On 4/26/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>At 5:06 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote:
> > >>>It's not XHTML 1.0 Strict valid .. :P
> > >>>You're page is HTML 4.01 valid, i think you should make it XHTML 1.0
Strict.
> > >>
> > >>Argggg. Then I would have to add all those "/" to my ">" in all my
> > >>code in all my sites. Literally millions of new "/" would have to be
> > >>added. That act could possibly crash the net.
> > >>
> > >>So, until someone points out a good reason for me to change (I'm open
> > >>for redirection), I'll continue to use what works for me. Besides,
> > >>it's still compliant, isn't it?
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>
> > >>tedd
> > >
> > >HTML 4.01 will become deprecated earlier then XHTML 1.0 :)
> > >
> > >That's all i know :P
> > >
> > >Tijnema
> >
> > And tedd will become deprecated earlier than teddd -- I can wait.
> >
> > Besides, when HTML 4.01 finally does, someone will make a parser that
> > will fix everything.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > tedd
>
> Hmm, if that is gonna work completly, i want to see :P
> Look how many things are deprecated/removed in XHTML 1.0 Strict v HTML 4.01
> A lot things have been replaced with styles in XHTML 1.0 Strict.
>
> I see microsoft as the first one that will ignore HTML 4.01, in IE8 maybe?
So we're talking around 2012? Hell, I'll be retired by then!!! ;)
Cheers,
Rob.
You maybe, but not everyone (like me :P)
I would love to, but well, i guess i can't stop when i'm 20 years old :)
Tijnema
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
