On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 21:40 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 10:24 AM -0400 7/6/07, Robert Cummings wrote: > >On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 10:08 -0400, tedd wrote: > > > I doubt that one can demarcate the non-chicken parents from the > >> chicken offspring. So... it is perplexing. > > > >We don't need to demarcate, we only need to know that it happened. > > Yes, but knowing that something has happened, does not mean that we > know how it happened. :-)
Actually in this case there is only one possible way it could have happened. I'll lay it out simply for you if I must, but it's simple logical progression. > This, my friend, is one of those things we can debate forever without > reaching a definitive answer. No, it absolutely has a definitive answer. > Thus, my assertion that this question is perplexing still stands. > Unless, of course, you wish to challenge it and thus confirm my > assertion further. Check and mate. :-) The basis of your assertion is incorrect. Methinks you're being presumptuous by declaring check and mate prematurely. Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
