Jochem Maas wrote:
Per Jessen schreef:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't/shouldn't have
strong
and loose typing in the same language. In my opinion.
"Instead of providing programmers with a black or white choice
between static or dynamic typing, we should instead strive for
softer type systems. That is, static typing where possible, dynamic
typing when needed. Unfortunately there is a discontinuity between
contemporary statically typed and dynamically typed languages as
well as a huge technical and cultural gap between the respective
language communities."
I'm not sure whether to take you seriously now - you're quoting from
a Microsoft research paper? :-)
lol well picked up - for all I'm a linux fan M$ aren't all bad and
hell they must have some very good programmers in the various teams,
seems a shame to invalidate thier hard work and research just because
they work for satan.
Completely agree, I just thought I'd score an easy point ...
+1 to you both :-)
omfg positivety returns to the list :-D cheers guys!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
