On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Stuart Dallas <stut...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:36, Rene Veerman wrote: > >> unless the actual php development team would like to weigh in on this >> matter of course. >> >> yes, i do consider it that important. >> >> these nay-sayers usually also lobby the dev-team to such extent that >> these features would actually not make it into php. > > Frankly I don't give a crap whether threading is supported in PHP, it does > everything I need it to do. If I need threading I use a language that > supports it, like Python or C++.
good, so we'll put you down as a "neutral"... despite what follows; > > I love the way you call us nay-sayers like it's supposed to be an insult. I > follow the KISS principle to the nth, and as such threading in PHP doesn't > make a lot of sense to me. I'm yet to come across a problem I couldn't solve > with pure PHP, but when the need arises I have no issue mixing in a little > C++, Python, Ruby, or whatever, to meet my performance and scalability goals. > I go to the mountain, I don't sit there complaining that the mountain ain't > moving in my direction! your metaphor is funny but inaccurate. therefore invalid. > > My opinion, and that of most others who've weighed in, is that you're almost > certainly looking at the problem from the wrong angle. What you haven't done > is explicitly explain why you want threading to be supported. Give us a real > example of why you think it should be supported and I guarantee we can come > up with a way to get you what you want without requiring massive changes to > the core of your chosen tool. And if we can't then you may actually convince > us that threading would be a valuable feature to have available. no sorry i don't have to. all i'll say is: realtime systems with real work to do, are often better implemented with a non-sql solution that can use threading and shared memory support. period. it's so blatantly obvious that i don't feel like i have to spell out a complete example, which YOU can then say: "ah, but there's different ways of doing that!". STOP TRYING TO DETERMINE MY HABITS AND CHOICE OF TOOLS. > You mentioned Facebook as an example of a popular application. Are you aware > that they only recently started using their compiler in production, and that > prior to that they were happily running PHP to serve their front end without > ever complaining that it didn't support threading? Even now, with hip-hop, > individual requests are served in a single thread, so the language itself > still doesn't support threading, and I don't hear them complaining that it's > costing them a fortune. Why? Because it's not. And if it was they would have > added it by now. yea, they didn't complain, they had the cash income to build the hip-hop compiler. i thank 'm for it. > > One final thing... if threading is this important to you, then I'm sure there > are a number of developers who would happily add it in a fork of the core for > suitable compensation. Once implemented it's possible the internals team > would accept it for addition to the official version. If you really believe > it has the potential to save you a butt-load of cash, the economics of paying > for it should stack up. I dont feel i need to pay for a programming language keeping up with the times. Then i'll indeed find another language to use. > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Rene Veerman <rene7...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> php is not a hammer, its a programming language. >>> > > And bravo on the metaphor appreciation failure. Love it! > > -Stuart > > -- > http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
