On 2 Apr 2013, at 14:50, Sorin Badea <sorin.bade...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to wait for it and surely I don't want to safe that pid in > same place. I just want to use `ps` with a pattern to return my forked > process. Storing the PID of a process you need to monitor is the established method, and is certainly the most reliable. Why can't you use the PID as the pattern to look for? If there's a reason then please explain it as that will help us assist you. If there's no reason then I don't understand why you're trying to over-complicate it. If you're just wanting to monitor it from the process that forked it then you don't need to store the PID anywhere other than a variable, and you don't need to wait for it. If you absolutely must do this then the only way is via an extension such as proctitle: http://php.net/setproctitle -Stuart -- Stuart Dallas 3ft9 Ltd http://3ft9.com/ > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Matijn Woudt <tijn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> pcntl_fork will return the pid of the fork, what is wrong with using that >> pid to identify the process? >> >> - Matijn >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Sorin Badea <sorin.bade...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> I'm trying to find a solution to identify a php process that is spawned >>> with pnctl_fork. I've tried to set a custom gid but this isn't viable >>> because I have to run the parent proc with administrative permissions. I >>> need to do this native without any pecl extensions. >>> Is there a way to do this ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Badea Sorin (unu.sorin) >>> sorin.bade...@gmail.com >>> unu_so...@yahoo.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Badea Sorin (unu.sorin) > sorin.bade...@gmail.com > unu_so...@yahoo.com > Pagina personala: > http://badeasorin.com
