From: "Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > a) Writing a new DSSSL customization or > > > b) Writing a new XSL customization > > > > > > because > > > > [...] > > > > XML is the way we go. If you want HTML, I want LaTeX :) > > Well, I cannot fully understand how this is related, or > how this holds an opinion of yours, but HTML is the > only format going to be supported for offline help > on MS platforms in the following few years. They > will release MS Help 2.0 the next year. It supports > XML for TOC specifications, but HTML is the format > for Help content. > > Or is your comment related to use XSL instead of > DSSSL, pointing to DSSSL with the LaTeX analogy?
No, if XSLT works better as DSSSL, why not use it. HTML would be a step in the wrong direction. XML is the future and I don´t rely on MS. Sure you can only display HTML in most browsers, but this can change in future. -Egon
