> > What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists > > anywhere... We have <note role="seealso"> but it is also not > > used anywhere. We have see also lists written as > > <para>See also: ...</para>. > > > > Goba > > Yeah, I know. But it looked like Derick had something bigger in > mind and I wanted to meet two primary criteria: 1) not fuck with > what seemed to be the general idea, and 2) compile. I figured we'd > work out the details after that. Maybe this was something which was > discussed at the meeting? :)
Well, we've not discussed the actual tags to use, but the concept is what Derick introduced. It will become a de facto standard this way. I really like the divisions, but we need to have the see also lists standard in partintros and function pages... Goba
