On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 01:53, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > > What? We do not have sections like this for see also lists > > > anywhere... We have <note role="seealso"> but it is also not > > > used anywhere. We have see also lists written as > > > <para>See also: ...</para>. > > > > > > Goba > > > > Yeah, I know. But it looked like Derick had something bigger in > > mind and I wanted to meet two primary criteria: 1) not fuck with > > what seemed to be the general idea, and 2) compile. I figured we'd > > work out the details after that. Maybe this was something which was > > discussed at the meeting? :) > > Well, we've not discussed the actual tags to use, but the > concept is what Derick introduced. It will become a de facto > standard this way. I really like the divisions, but we need > to have the see also lists standard in partintros and function > pages... > > Goba
I agree 100% with all of that. But section was the only valid element at that point, and I neglected to remember the recently discussed standard. :/ I'll try to think of a better solution. -- Torben Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com http://www.hybrid17.com http://www.inflatableeye.com +1.604.709.0506
