> Maybe you can add some arguments here, something like : > "this feature may be usefull if you need to include a file but don't > want to have extra lines after the closing tags (for headers for > example), etc etc"
> something that will make the doc more consistant ;) Thanks for advice. I think that this feature is strange and improper so it's not easy for me to explain why it's there. You know that newline just behind ?> is stripped. So even if you end included file by ?>\n and not by ?>, headers work still well. If you know why this features is there, please describe it more precisely. I really don't know - it's straight against XML compliance. Jakub Vrana P.S. I'm already subscribed in the list so there's no need to send me Cc :-).
