On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 at 15:05:06, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > [Note: intentionally crossposted to a lot of addresses.]
Did so as well :-)) > It is a long time TODO item on the phpdoc TODO list, that we should set > up a website specifically for the documentation team. Now as we are > preparing for an initial version of the site, and livedocs is in the > works, a need for a joint documentation website came up, which would > include information and tools for people working on the php-doc, > pear-doc, pecl-doc, php-gtk-doc, smarty-doc and livedocs stuff. Since > livedocs will hopefully help us unify our systems, and share our > experience and detached development more easily, it would be desirable > to set up a joint website. It would also help translators to move around > the projects, and contributors to help out in more than one project. [...] I personally like the idea of having a joint documentation. There have been several people playing (working?) with live-docs in the last few month - but afaik from the pear-doc-team there is not yet something definitive when we would have the chance to switch to livedocs (correct me if needed). Meanwhile since pear-doc only rebuilds once a week one or two people have set up builds on their private servers that function as a possibility for people without the possibility for pear-doc-compilation to see if their contributions work or if there are link-errors etc. It would also imho be nice to have the projects on a joined doc-site since this would function as a central source of information. However, a short while ago in a meeting we've agreed to integrate things like Wiki-docs and user-contributed notes for the pear-doc. Am I correct that these projects can be paused for now? How soon do you think the joined doc could come reality? Another point that I've lately got involved with is CHM-doc-building from the pear-doc. Dieter Raber who did build our CHM-docs in the past has a few days ago assembled a package of his scripts together with basis documentation. Currently the CHM-docs don't exist for all languages and are not as up-to-date as the HTML-version. We've talked about reviving the CHM-docs again. Would this also be not needed, if we join the documentation-forces? Do you also plan to supply (automatic) CHM-builds on the new server? (Okay, I know there needs to be some Windows-machine actually to do the final step of putting the CHM- together.) > Now I would like to ask you to just think about this a bit, and if you > are interested in the development, please provide your opinion on how > would it be best to discuss the further directions (crosspost replies, a > designated mailing list, personal emails, IRC, or something else?) Imho a new mailinglist would be a good idea. But I'd vote to first not list it on lists.php.net to the public. Using crossposts or private emails seems less practical to me. Everybody interested from the document-teams can join in on such a new list if he feels like it. Keep up the idea. I like it - somehow :-)) Stefan
