When I was talking about bogus or fixed, it's because I've talked about
the doc problem or a livedoc problem in my first message... Yes it
wasn't the good bug type, but I can't put two bug types :) Normally,
when that happens, the bug used to be reclassified.
Regards
Jean-Sébastien Goupil
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sean Coates wrote:
Sean, update your ulinks. =)
http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ulink.html
"When the content of the ULink element is empty, i.e., for either of
the following cases: <ulink url="..."/> and <ulink url="..."></ulink>,
the content of the url attribute should be rendered as the text of the
link."
This begs the question, then:
Which docbook reference should we now consider "definitive"? Obviously,
we're looking at two different references. If I'm using the wrong one,
then I'm sorry, but let's settle this.
S
