Hi Nuno,

Got phpdoc and necessary tools installed and now it fails with the error
below:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] phpdoc]$ make
rm -rf html && mkdir html
/usr/local/bin/php -q ./scripts/rtlpatch/hackmanuallang.php en
SP_ENCODING=XML SP_CHARSET_FIXED=YES /usr/bin/openjade -D . -wno-idref -c
./entities/ISO/catalog -c ./dsssl/docbook/catalog -c
./dsssl/defaults/catalog -d dsssl/html.dsl -V use-output-dir -t sgml
./dtds/dbxml-4.1.2/phpdocxml.dcl manual.xml
/usr/bin/openjade:E: error reading "dsssl/catalog" (Is a directory)


I checked "~/phpdoc/dssl/catalog" is a directory.
OpenJade 1.3.1
OpenSP 1.3.4

The same problem happens under Windows/Cygwin (openjade 1.3.3pre1) and under
native Linux (openjade version is listed above).
Any ideas?

Thanks,
JV.


""Nuno Lopes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The chm build tools are available at http://cvs.php.net/phpdoc/chm
> However this is a problem in the server's configuration, because the chms
> I've built on my machine are fine. It's probably just a locales problem
> within openjade.
>
> Nuno
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > Hi Nuno,
> > Thanks for your prompt reply.
> > Sorry for bothering, I'd have checked bugtracker myself.
> >
> > I'd like to contribute and fix this problem or at least find the origin
of
> > the trouble.
> > Could you please point me out to the instructions relevant to CHM
targets?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JV.
> >
> >
> > ""Nuno Lopes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This is a know problem and is being tracked at
http://bugs.php.net/33838
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Nuno
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > What's wrong with php-doc in CHM format?
> >> > There are a lot of "????" symbols throughout all the manual.
> >> > In stead of "Next", "Prev" and many topic captions etc links I see
just
> >> > series of "?".
> >> > CHM file is dated 2005-09-19, md5sum =
> >> > 0578af416d91cc9bdf3fed5e4ffa48ac,
> >> > English.
> >> >
> >> > I tried an old and quite outdated CHMs and they work just fine.
> >> > What's up with newer ones?
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > JV.

Reply via email to