On 2/27/07, techtonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/25/07, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/25/07, techtonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Why?
> > > Do these 6letters really annoy you that much?
> >
> > No, but besides these 7 extra symbols there is also author name,
> > letter date, flags and all other useful stuff that doesn't make the
> > information fit into one line.
>
> Why should it?
> The most important info are the files and the module.

Even if it is important in 99% of cases (i.e. 99 files from 100) the
module is obvious and those extra symbols make me constantly scroll to
see what name is at the end of /en/reference/bla-bla-bla/path.xml

I prefer consistency with other modules over an edge case "useless" fix.



If there is a brand new customized loginfo.pl script (why not PHP,
BTW?) - why it can't be made to display a module name only if it is
different from default? For example (I do know Perl, do not beat me):

Its not written in PHP because PHP-cli didn't exist at the time...
If you really really really want to make any changes to that script
you are barking up the wrong tree here :]


--- loginfo_old.pl      Tue Feb 27 12:24:46 2007
+++ loginfo.pl  Tue Feb 27 16:26:45 2007
@@ -224,6 +224,14 @@
         $DAYABBR[$gmtime[6]], $gmtime[3], $MONABBR[$gmtime[4]],
         $gmtime[5] + 1900, $gmtime[2], $gmtime[1], $gmtime[0]);

+my $subj_module = $module.$subj_tag;
+# Skip module name in subject line if the name is default for mailing list
+if ($subj_tag eq "") {
+  if ($module eq "phpdoc" && $#mailto eq 1 && $mailto[1] eq
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]") {
+    $subj_module = "";
+  }
+}
+
 no strict; # quiet warnings after here

 my $email;
@@ -232,7 +240,7 @@
        "To: ". join(", ", @mailto). "\n".
        $msgid.
        $rfc822date.
-       "Subject: cvs: $module$subj_tag $subj\n";
+       "Subject: cvs: $subj_module $subj\n";

 my $common_body = "".
        "$cvsuser\t\t".localtime()." UTC\n".



> > Ok, what about making a separate list for maintaining phpdoc/ tools then?
>
> You said earlier that it was already decided to split the lists
> down... make it happen :)

Gimme da passwoodzzz! =) No, seriously - I just do not know what is
the next thing to do - I've already mailed systems several times.

Then do it again. Short, to-the-point mail (and links to back up the decision).

Heck, I read the posts you linked to before but I didn't understand
the motivation nor the exact conclusion...

-Hannes


--
--anatoly t.

Reply via email to