> > The most important info are the files and the module.
>
> Even if it is important in 99% of cases (i.e. 99 files from 100)
the
> module is obvious and those extra symbols make me constantly
scroll to
> see what name is at the end of /en/reference/bla-bla-bla/path.xml
I prefer consistency with other modules over an edge case
"useless" fix.
You will get your [PHP-DOC] tag anyways. Common - it is a very simple
and intuitive fix. There is no "useful" information lost over an edge
case (for what it means). If I am receiving spam like any other user
on a planet Earth I am against that consistency. =)
I don't see a true need here and would rather not deviate from the
other php mailing lists so prefer to keep the subject line as is.
Get a wider monitor ;)
> > > Ok, what about making a separate list for maintaining
phpdoc/ tools then?
> >
> > You said earlier that it was already decided to split the lists
> > down... make it happen :)
>
> Gimme da passwoodzzz! =) No, seriously - I just do not know what is
> the next thing to do - I've already mailed systems several times.
Then do it again. Short, to-the-point mail (and links to back up
the decision).
Heck, I read the posts you linked to before but I didn't understand
the motivation nor the exact conclusion...
You mean this one? - http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.doc.chm/
1262?s=
It is a copy of my post sent to systems@ and there was a follow-up
thread, but I can't find public archive for systems@, so I can't point
you to it.
I can rewrite the mail to clearly outline the motivation to separate
manual editors work from manual tools work. I just afraid the
explanation will be too banal.
Please write the mail and send it here as a new thread. We'll all
discuss
(again?) then as a group plan how to move forward. If we want this list
then I know we can make it happen but few, except you, even remember
thinking about this topic.
Also, writing down your thoughts will help us all know which list to use
as sometimes there is overlap, like between docweb, phpdoc, and the
newly
proposed list for tools. So three doc lists, will it be (or is it
already)
too confusing? I don't know.
In the future let's discuss these topics here and then post the final
results to systems@ because although our discussions are exciting, they
don't need our spam.
Regards,
Philip
