On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 07:28, Kalle Sommer Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/12/4 Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Using a revision attribute (like proposed last year, and again >> recently) on the root elements of all chunks would however possibly >> make it possible. >> PhD could read the revision attribute of all chunks and register the >> revision to the xml:id, then when building translations it could >> compare those revisions and mark the xml:id/chunk as outdated (i.e. >> pregenerate "this page is outdated" into the header or something). > > How much would be needed for this? I know that revcheck probably will > break aswell as all translations. But from your point of view would it > be reasonable to make that change?
We would have to update all the translations and remember to bump their EN-Revisions too (which actually will no longer exist, the "EN-Revision" would be the revision="" attribute) if the file is up2date. We would also have to update various translation scripts I guess. I'm not entirely sure how much work it will be all together, maybe a days work (updating the XML and PhD)... -Hannes
