> >>>
> >> No, and what is worse svn does not fail, it simply ignores any changes
> >> in svn:externals.
> >>
> >> Unless you only ever plan to change docs in a single translation, I
> >> don't recommend using the svn:externals modules.  However, for those
> >> people who are exclusively documenting in 1 language, and never touch
> >> the source code they're documenting it is a great system.
> >>
> >> For everyone else, use a sparse checkout.  I put in a small amount of
> >> effort last week to make phd work, and as long as you aren't adding in
> >> images, it works fine (phd needs a small change to allow it to find
> >> images in a sparse checkout, which I have not and will not investigate
> >> since I don't care about images :).
> >>
> >> Greg
> >>
> >>
> >
> > My experience is different. I'm using TortoiseSVN on Windows XP SP3.
> >
> > I recently made a change to doc-en involving both doc-base and en -
> > see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=286553
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Great - so that means users of TortoiseSVN don't have this issue.  The
> command-line subversion client is the only deficiency if you're using
> svn:externals.  Good to know.
>

Hi,

I just made a simple test with my repository and native svn-client

Subversion 1.4.4
native svn-client 1.6.3

repository layout:

> tmp/test1
> tmp/test2
> tmp/test3
>

under tmp/test1 , svn:externals

> ext-t2 http://localhost/svn/tmp/test2
> ext-t3 http://localhost/svn/tmp/test3
>

So, when I make svn co http://localhost/svn/tmp/test1, the whole thing
becomes

> /test1
> /test1/ext-t2
> /test1/ext-t3
>

Then I touched 3 files.

> /test1/t1
> /test1/ext-t2/t2
> /test1/ext-t3/t3
>

svn st gives

> X       ext-t2
> X       ext-t3
> ?       t1
>
> Performing status on external item at 'ext-t2'
> ?       ext-t2/t2
>
> Performing status on external item at 'ext-t3'
> ?       ext-t3/t3
>

after svn add and I perform svn ci -m "test" t1 ext-t2/t2 ext-t3/t3 gives:

> Adding         t2
> Adding         ext-t2/t2
> Adding         ext-t3/t3
>

Commit with no problem and sharing the same commit log. Thus I think
svn:externals gives no problem at all (with native svn-client 1.6.x I think)

ks

Reply via email to