Lars Torben Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > Just asking because I've been out of the loop for a while (again) but > a coworker recently noticed this BC break in func_get_args() and > friends. While the changes to way func_get_args() do seem necessary > this should probably still be documented. I just wanted to make sure > I'm not breaking any current standards too badly with this. :) > > I've added similar notes and examples to func-get-arg.xml and > func-arg-num.xml but have left them out of this email for brevity. > > If I don't hear any objections I'll commit tomorrow. Or if I get an OK > tonight, I'll commit tonight. :) > > Comments/fixes of course are welcome. > > > Cheers, > > Torben > > > Index: reference/funchand/functions/func-get-args.xml > =================================================================== > --- reference/funchand/functions/func-get-args.xml (revision 287473) > +++ reference/funchand/functions/func-get-args.xml (working copy) > @@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ > This function can now be used in parameter lists. > </entry> > </row> > + <row> > + <entry>5.3.0</entry> > + <entry> > + If this function is called from the outtermost scope of a file > + which has been included by calling <function>include</function> > + or <function>require</function> from within a function in the > + calling file, now generates a warning and returns &false;. > + </entry>
How about: "As of PHP version 5.3.0, func_get_args() may no longer be called in this manner <example>. Output in PHP versions older than 5.3.0: <output> Output in PHP versions 5.3.0 and newer <output>"
