Maybe Phillip would have something to add to this conversation :) ? J.Pauli
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote: > Good idea Stas. We could do some greping or php scripting to look for > PHP4 references and move them all to a file/chapter. > > Perhaps that is a good idea to start writing a manual that could make > it easy in the future by adding some custom DocBook tags that would be > easy to fetch, like <note phpversion="4"> This feature has been added > to PHP 4.3.3</note> ? > > J.Pauli > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Adam Harvey <ahar...@php.net> wrote: >> On 15 January 2011 23:46, Daniel Brown <danbr...@php.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we >>>> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 + >>>> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3 >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> Getting rid of PHP4, sure, but I think it's a horrible idea to get >>> rid of all PHP < 5.2 references. >> >> Agreed. I'd probably add 5.0 to the list of releases that could be >> removed from the manual, but 5.1.6 is still the standard PHP version >> Red Hat ship in RHEL 5 (although they've at least added an optional >> set of 5.3 packages in RHEL 5.6), so we should probably continue to >> document 5.1 as long as RHEL 5 is in wide use. >> >> Adam >> >
