Maybe Phillip would have something to add to this conversation :) ?

J.Pauli


On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote:
> Good idea Stas. We could do some greping or php scripting to look for
> PHP4 references and move them all to a file/chapter.
>
> Perhaps that is a good idea to start writing a manual that could make
> it easy in the future by adding some custom DocBook tags that would be
> easy to fetch, like <note phpversion="4"> This feature has been added
> to PHP 4.3.3</note> ?
>
> J.Pauli
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Adam Harvey <ahar...@php.net> wrote:
>> On 15 January 2011 23:46, Daniel Brown <danbr...@php.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we
>>>> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 +
>>>> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3
>>>
>>>    -1
>>>
>>>    Getting rid of PHP4, sure, but I think it's a horrible idea to get
>>> rid of all PHP < 5.2 references.
>>
>> Agreed. I'd probably add 5.0 to the list of releases that could be
>> removed from the manual, but 5.1.6 is still the standard PHP version
>> Red Hat ship in RHEL 5 (although they've at least added an optional
>> set of 5.3 packages in RHEL 5.6), so we should probably continue to
>> document 5.1 as long as RHEL 5 is in wide use.
>>
>> Adam
>>
>

Reply via email to