On Jul 6, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 17:15, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote: >> >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 4:20 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:20, Hannes Magnusson >>> <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> >>>> Currently our php.net/indexes is "manually generated" with the >>>> genfuncindex.php script.. >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose to use an PI for this, and generate the list in PhD... >>>> You could print out indexes for pretty much anything PhD indexes.. so >>>> the following patch prints out the list of all refentries and >>>> examples. >>> >>> >>> There is a slight problem with that. >>> There doesn't seem to be any correct way of differentiating >>> refentries.. so if its a refentry for function, method, variable, url >>> wrapper, context option.. PhD has no idea. >>> I played around a little trying to teach the indexer the difference >>> (depending on the refnames, and the rest of the structure of the >>> file), but it becomes very messy and not 100% accurate. >>> >>> I can't think of any other way then to modify the markup to explicitly >>> mention what kind of refentry it is.. thoughts? >>> Maybe its not important for the indexes page, just list all refentries >>> alphabetically? >> >> Wouldn't we use PhD_IDE for this task? It contains the appropriate >> information, and has already generated funcsummary.txt. I forgot about >> funcindex.xml but will look into doing this. >> > > > How would that work exactly? > First run PhD_IDE to generate doc-base/funcindex.xml manually every > week and then run PhD_PHP like normal? > > And how does PhD_IDE know what is what without scanning the ID and > blindly guessing?
Sorry, I see PhD_IDE as a magic bullet that solves all problems but shouldn't think like this. PhD_PHP should solve the problem but I lack solutions. And yes, PhD_IDE generating funcindex.xml was the idea there. Maybe Moacir has a few thoughts on this matter. Also, changing funcindex.xml to a full index is possible. I for one never use funcindex, but maybe others like it? A real index may be more valuable but I'm not sure how large that'd be, or how it'd look. Ideas? I think it's worth pursuing. Regards, Philip
