Drak <d...@zikula.org> writes: > On 4 March 2012 03:59, David Soria Parra <d...@php.net> wrote: > > On 2012-01-19, Yannick Torrès <yannick.tor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > --e89a8f235177550b4404b6e66798 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > Hi Philip, Hannes, > > > > About Git migration : how are we deal with the revcheck tag ? Is there a > > link between SVN revision ID and futur Git revision ID ? Is there a > script > > to automatically update translation to include the right Git revision ID > > into the revcheck tag ? > > I don't know much about it, but git supports keywords. You can have an > $Id$ field that is replaced by the sha1. As far as I know, nothing in > the doc tree assumes that revision numbers are ordered (as sha1's are > not ordered)? > > > You should just get rid of keywords, I've never seen anyone using in the git > world which is now in the millions. > > Drak
To expand on this a little bit, as a bit of an outsider to this community, but a heavy user of git, there isn't much (if anything) in the way of information that is given by use of keywords in this manner that you can't get from the VCS with minimal effort. I have also never seen them used in the git world, although I'm sure they are by some people. If someone has a solid use-case for them, I'd love to hear it.
