On 30 June 2013 17:32, Levi Morrison <morrison.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On 26 June 2013 21:10, Levi Morrison <morrison.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I currently don't know anything about PHD. I'm willing to learn and work >>> on this, but my understanding is that before I make any changes that I am >>> supposed to mail this list to get input. >>> >> >> This certainly feels like something we should be doing in PhD-land. >> "Fixing" the docs would be a nightmare, we wrap everything in <para>s. And >> remember that HTML isn't the only output format for our docs, any changes >> to the DocBook structure must take the other media into consideration. >> > > The general impression I had was that I should get more feedback from > this. Do I have a green light from Peter Cowburn alone or should I be > waiting for other responses? > > Hold on, you haven't even gotten a "green light" from me! What is the ultimate aim here? To get HTML that is "valid"? To fix a rendering bug? If it's the former, then making PhD spew out "valid" HTML is the task and if you really want to spend the time working on it, no-one will stop you! If the latter, I would probably look instead at fixing the broken CSS.
