I referred to two approaches because I felt that the two 'interfaces' might not be progressive (i.e. steps down the same road). I suppose in some abstract way I could be wrong in that the path info in the URIs is an 'identity' in both cases (e.g. http://..../Collection.php/12 versus http://..../Collection.php/part/5/subpart/15). If the first case the identity passed to a retrieve, say, could be 12 and in the second it could be part/5/subpart/15.
+1 for doing the simple CRUDE first :-) On 11 Jun, 11:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I agree with Matthew's sentiment. I think we have enough ideas here to > have a crack at the simple CRUDE case. I view the second case as being > similar to the first case but with more complex URIs. I think it is > useful to point out that this extra complexity is required in reall > applications (which Joes presentation that Graham references makes > clear) but I think it's something we should consider as an extension > to the simple case. > > Regards > > Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
