Hi Jon, > >"misc/setf.l" is just a joke ;-) > > Unfortunately I still don't understand that joke. :-( > There must be some reason why it's there ...
Not really. I'm a strong opponent of the CL 'setf' function. I think it completely violates the spirit of how Lisp functions evaluate their arguments. But I don't want to start a flame war here ... It makes no sense to use this 'setf' in PicoLisp. Better use plain 'set' on 'var' arguments. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe