If you can choose, I don't know what are you waiting for... have fun! 2015-07-20 13:03 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila <amherag@gmailcom>:
> Not using BLAS or LAPACK. > > 2015-07-20 3:53 GMT-07:00 Manuel Cano <manutalc...@gmail.com>: > >> What gives you more fun? >> >> 2015-07-20 12:18 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila <amhe...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I appreciate people who know the term "computational intelligence." >>> PicoCI sounds good. >>> >>> I know that BLAS and LAPACK are battle-tested, but in that case I would >>> just use other libraries in other programming languages (this is how I >>> feel). I've been doing CI in common lisp using clml, mgl-gpr, mgl, and >>> others, and I even have access to run my models in CUDA GPUs with my >>> current setup. I'd like to see PilOS running CI in a near future, and >>> without the dependencies on fortran's BLAS and LAPACK. >>> >>> I'm still open to constructive criticism. Should we take a purist >>> approach or should we go the battle-tested safer route? >>> >>> >>> 2015-07-20 2:32 GMT-07:00 Robert Herman <rpjher...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> I would welcome the results of your efforts, and contribute where I >>>> could, but I think it would be best to make calls to BLAS and LAPACK, since >>>> they are battle-tested. I am currently working my way through a book >>>> 'Handbook of Neuroevolution through Erlang', but I prefer Lisp. Erlang is >>>> just better at the fault tolerance, distributed thing. >>>> Lush2 Lisp was used for heavy numerics, so you may want to look there >>>> for some guidance, however the Sourceforge site is down at the moment. >>>> I am currently trying to get PilOS running on Qemu on a Win 8.1 64bit >>>> machine. I'd love to have that and computational intelligence libraries >>>> working in 64bit PicoLisp! Hey, how about PicoCi or PicoCI? >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Rowan Thorpe <ro...@rowanthorpe.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015/07/20-01:01, Amaury Hernández Águila wrote: >>>>> > I think this will be an exciting project. I'll try a pure PicoLisp >>>>> > implementation and see how far I can go. Any suggestions to the name >>>>> of the >>>>> > library? PicoML sounds good. >>>>> > >>>>> > Currently, I would start with a fuzzy logic toolbox, genetic >>>>> programming >>>>> > and an architecture to create multi-agent systems. The second step >>>>> would be >>>>> > to create neural networks. >>>>> >>>>> If you will develop on a public repo, please do send this thread a >>>>> link to it >>>>> when you feel it is at a point that others could send pull-requests to >>>>> (or open >>>>> issues for) to help with the progress. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rowan Thorpe >>>>> PGP fingerprint: >>>>> BB0A 0787 C0EE BDD8 7F97 3D30 49F2 13A5 265D CCBD >>>>> ---- >>>>> "There is a great difference between worry and concern. A worried >>>>> person sees >>>>> a problem, and a concerned person solves a problem." >>>>> - Harold Stephens >>>>> -- >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Manuel >> > > -- Manuel
