If somebody does not want to put their license on *every* source code file, I can live with that, unwise as it is. But it has to be at least mentioned once in the source code package! Or at least once in the place where you get the code from!
I don't know how this works in the rest of the world, but in the USA, copyright means ALL RIGHTS RESERVED unless the copyright holder declares otherwise. On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 07:47 +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:44:33AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:05:20PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > > > Hi, this does look interesting! However, the license for the code > > > is > > > not stated clearly anywhere in the code or on the wiki, as near > > > as I > > > can tell. > > > > Uuhh, in what kind of world are we living!? In which people become > > paranoid > > about the license for a *single* line of code? Surely not my world. > > Sorry, I just noticed that this referred to the bitbucket wiki, not > the > single-liner! Still ... >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
