Got it! ... thanks Alex! Regards, Kashyap On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:29 AM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:19AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote: > > I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the > > "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t .... I see that there > are > > several usages of long in the code other than the couple of places I > > changed. > > The general assumption in PicoLisp is that the "normal" scalar size is the > same > as the pointer size. On 32 bits both a pointer and a long are 32 bits, and > on > all 64 bit Unix systems I saw so far both were 64 bits. Thus, miniPicoLisp > compiled fine both on 32 and 64 bit systems. > > > > I was wondering though if there is some implementation of miniPicoLisp > out > > there that I could use as reference - perhaps just with the ability to > call > > an external program. > > You could perhaps use some parts of pil32 (?). > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe > >
