Absolutely!!! If that is done - I believe there is no reason not to have pil64 in C too right :) Regards, Kashyap
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:55 PM Andras Pahi <pa...@t-online.hu> wrote: > Hi, > > If you are still interested in native/lisp in picolisp32 then I am working > to support the pil64 > features in picolisp32. The development branch of > https://github.com/pahihu/picoLisp > just missing the coroutines (stay tuned), and builds on 64bit/32bit > targets. > It uses libffi for the native C calls. > > Regards, > Andras > > On 2020. May 8., at 16:36, C K Kashyap <ckkash...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Alex, > I think I'll try and see if I can get a simple SDL callback to work with > miniPicoLisp - that way, I can really understand the issues better. > If I remember correctly - pil21 initially did not have the POSIX > requirement. Is there a way to get older versions of pil21 (I know that it > is a strange request for a POC :) ) > > Thanks Tomas for your ffi link. > > Regards, > Kashyap > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:24 AM Tomas Hlavaty <t...@logand.com> wrote: > >> Hi Kashyap, >> >> C K Kashyap <ckkash...@gmail.com> writes: >> > I am now trying to figure out how to do FFI min miniPicoLisp and I >> > realized that only pil64 has native/lisp support. Is there any reason >> > it could not be done in the 'c' implementation of pil32? I just wanted >> > to make sure that there is no "impossibility" about attempting to port >> > the native/lisp functions to miniPicoLisp. >> >> here is an example of ffi with minipicolisp: >> https://logand.com/sw/mplisp/files.html >> >> Cheers >> >> Tomas >> >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >> > >
