Arg, I am terrible at making patches :(

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Hadoop QA (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12872194#action_12872194]
>
> Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1420:
> --------------------------------
>
> -1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
>  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12444886/addconcat2.patch
>  against trunk revision 948526.
>
>    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
>
>    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified
> tests.
>
>    -1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.
>
> Console output:
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/5/console
>
> This message is automatically generated.
>
> > Make CONCAT act on all fields of a tuple, instead of just the first two
> fields of a tuple
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: PIG-1420
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1420
> >             Project: Pig
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >          Components: impl
> >    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> >            Reporter: Russell Jurney
> >            Assignee: Russell Jurney
> >             Fix For: 0.8.0
> >
> >         Attachments: addconcat2.patch
> >
> >   Original Estimate: 24h
> >  Remaining Estimate: 24h
> >
> > org.apache.pig.builtin.CONCAT (which acts on DataByteArray's internally)
> and org.apache.pig.builtin.StringConcat (which acts on Strings internally),
> both act on the first two fields of a tuple.  This results in ugly nested
> CONCAT calls like:
> > CONCAT(CONCAT(A, ' '), B)
> > The more desirable form is:
> > CONCAT(A, ' ', B)
> > This change will be backwards compatible, provided that no one was
> relying on the fact that CONCAT ignores fields after the first two in a
> tuple.  This seems a reasonable assumption to make, or at least a small
> break in compatibility for a sizable improvement.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>

Reply via email to