On Thursday, November 06, 2014 02:40:28 PM Ian Romanick wrote: > The test looks fine enough, but could you add a spec quotation to defend it? > > On 11/04/2014 04:19 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> > > --- > > tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > > > > diff --git a/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > > b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..37031cf > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > > +#version 300 es > > The #version shouldn't be necessary with the current infrastructure, right?
Actually, we do. I think this is a bug.
>
> > +// [config]
> > +// expect_result: fail
> > +// glsl_version: 3.00
> > +// [end config]
> > +//
> > +// Check that 'invariant(all)' cannot be used in fragment shader
> > +
> > +#pragma STDGL invariant(all)
> > +void main()
> > +{
> > +}
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Piglit mailing list
> Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
