On 13.12.2017 14:22, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Tapani,
Thanks for having a look!
On 13 December 2017 at 06:10, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> wrote:
Hi;
On 11.12.2017 22:15, Emil Velikov wrote:
+ /* Set the env. variable to force the platform 'detection' to use
+ * different platform (than X11).
+ *
+ * NOTE: This is not perfect, since driver may ignore the
variable, yet
+ * we aim to provide a consistent experience across test runs,
build
+ * permutation and/or driver used.
+ */
+// setenv("EGL_PLATFORM", "drm", true);
This must _not_ be commented out - silly mistake while doing some back
and forth testing.
I was about to ask but was not sure :)
+
+ /* XXX: test should flag regardless of the following call -
testing
+ * has confirmed it.
+ *
+ * NOTE: We cannot do the test twice - with and W/o the call; the
+ * detection result is stored in static variable :-\
+ */
+ piglit_egl_get_default_display(EGL_NONE);
+
+ /* Use X11 since it's the only platform that has EGL pixmap
surfaces */
+ piglit_require_egl_extension(EGL_NO_DISPLAY,
"EGL_EXT_platform_x11");
+}
+
+static enum piglit_result
+draw(struct egl_state *state)
+{
+ EGLNativePixmapType pixmap;
+ enum piglit_result result = PIGLIT_PASS;
+
+ /* Green for a pass */
+ glClearColor(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+ glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT);
+
+ pixmap = egl_util_create_native_pixmap(state,
egl_default_window_width,
+ egl_default_window_height);
Should we call XFlush(dpy) here or is it ok to go and use pixmap right away?
Cannot see any such requirement in the XCreatePixmap manpage. Plus the
existing piglit code using pixmaps doesn't do it :-\
Out of curiosity - the extra XFlush does not help with the DRI3 crash
mentioned earlier.
I was wondering if that would help but you are correct, it is not really
required, Pixmap handle is valid right away.
+ eglCopyBuffers(state->egl_dpy, state->surf, pixmap);
I think we could also read from pixmap and verify that it has green (in
every pixel)?
There might be need some additional synchronization if doing that, at least
dEQP issues eglWaitClient() before reading pixmap contents.
The test doesn't care how well eglCopyBuffers itself works - aim it to
illustrate the buggy validation in Mesa.
Hence the wait + pixmap readback are not really needed.
Admittedly the test name is quite misleading as-is - I'm short on
alternatives though :-(
OK, yeah that is fine. It's not far from 'complete test' though but such
athing can be also added later.
// Tapani
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
