The svn converter actually compares the common parts of the
repositores to find anomalies, with manually inserted clearingpoints
for those anomalies I have inspected and reacted on.  I hope you have
a similar system for the git repository to scrutinize the information
received from the CVS repositores (which can not be trusted as a
matter of prinicple).

Another repository could theoretically lead to new anomalies which
would affect the existing clearingpoint, but if no changes are done
directly in the repository it _should_ not happen.

Besides, making a new CVS repository would remove the blowtorch to
actually go through with the switch, meaning it will not happen for
another 2 years again...
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
      • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
          • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
  • Spl... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
      • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
        • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
          • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Spl... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum

Reply via email to