On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Peter Bortas @ Pike  developers forum wrote:
>>-2
>
> I gather (pun intended) that is a strong no vote, any alternate ideas on how
> to implement the desired functionality?  Or preferably no implementation at
> all?

It was a -1 for each name. None of them seem to be obvious pionters to
what they are supposed to do.

-- 
Peter

Reply via email to